Friday, December 14, 2018

Short Circuit Ratings for Industrial Control Panels




The Development of Short Circuit Ratings for Industrial Control Panels

                                           
Custom industrial control panel

Until the late 1990s Industrial Control Panels (enclosed electric devices not intended for residential use) did not have standardized short circuit ratings. These panels were built to accommodate diverse industrial applications and could not be easily standardized.

A short circuit occurs when the electrical dielectric (insulation or air gap) fail. When this happens the “flow” or current of electricity increases to levels that could cause a fire, explode, or cause a person to be shocked.

       
Enclosed devices damaged by short circuit

Short circuits are usually prevented by means of protective devices, such as a circuit breaker or a fuse. Protective devices are designed to stop short circuit currents by opening (creating an air gap that the electricity cannot jump across). Some protective devices are faster to open an air gap than other protective devices.

This means that some devices lets through more short circuit current than others. It was an engineering problem whether the protective devices could actually protect the other devices in the panel.

When I was clean shaven with dark hair

When I worked for Moeller Electric (no longer exists) it had very good protective devices. It limited the let through current (the overcurrent that gets through the protective device before it opens) we engineers were able to easily determine what devices could be protected without fire, explosion, or shock. The devices were mainly International Electrical Commission (IEC) designs.

Although we could determine short ratings for industrial control panels, these ratings were not always accepted by the regulating authorities or by the customers.
So we set out to create a national standard that included short circuit ratings for industrial control panels. 

The first step was to create a new standard at the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). I was assigned this task and a subcommittee of NEMA SC2 was formed. Because Moeller Electric initiated the project, I was made chair. We met mostly in Clearwater Beach Florida which my wife and I enjoyed. We still miss the area.

One of our articles on short circuit ratings for panels

The subcommittee did not last long as Underwriters Laboratories Inc. took over the effort by drafting its own standard UL 508A. This was actually a better situation for the development of short ratings as the editors were not competitors.

Once written and approved UL 508A became the basis for the National Electrical Code (NEC) published by the National Fire Protection Association. An increased degree of safety was added to the electrical construction industry. I am still happy today for being involved with the creation of the then new safety standard.

 Some of the competitor manufacturers had old style equipment and resisted the inclusion of IEC types of electrical devices. Their resistance to the new technology lasted until all of the big manufactures could develop or buy IEC devices to compete with devices made in the European Union.

Unfortunately the resistance to IEC devices continues today to the disadvantage of American panel makers and consumers. For example the science of insulation dielectric is prohibitive on the feeder side of a branch circuit device in the USA.  There is no scientific or safety reason for this prohibition.

There were many heated arguments during our advocacy of short circuit ratings for industrial control panels. Despite them we understood that we were representing the interests of a companies for which we worked. Although heated and loud the arguments were never personal. In 2004 I went to work at the College of the Holy, but have kept in touch with our former adversaries.

Sunday, June 17, 2018

JUNETEENTH 2018 WORCESTER



   Soul Food and other foods area


 Juneteenth 2018 Worcester


Juneteenth
, commemorates the June 19, 1865, announcement of the abolition of slavery in the in the state of Texas, and more generally the emancipation of enslaved African American throughout the former Confederacy..

Enslaved African Americans were officially emancipated by President Lincoln's executive order known as the Emancipation Proclamation, but actual emancipation was not effectuated until the Union soldiers began its reconstruction of Texas in 1865. On June 19, 1865 the Federal government in Texas declared slavery to be abolition. 

Juneteenth is thought to be the oldest continuous celebration of the end of slavery in the United States. 

]Emancipation Day celebration - 1900-06-19.jpg
Juneteenth 1900 in Texas




Juneteenth in Worcester has taken on an important role that is not fully recognized . Like many communities the Black community has it own diversity. There many religious belief and practises. Juneteenth is a secular event and everyone feels at home.

There is a new street preacher in town who has a curious interpretation of Revelations.

Several vendors selling their clothing had tables and racks. I bought a hat. I looked for my friend Lump's table, but I guess he was not at this year's celebration.

There are undegreed historian interpreting the use of crude sickles in the harvesting of sugar by enslaved African people. 

 I always see friends I have not seen for a long time and meet new people who I hope will be friends. 

The food is always good. I especially look forward to eating the food prepared by the church goers from the South. No one else makes better fried chicken, mac and cheese, and greens. Well maybe my wife does; she was born in the South.

This year there were Jamaican and Salvadoran vendors who made good jerk chicken and skewered beef. 

I was surprised by two vendors who cooked delicious deep fried fish. One of the cooks was New York. The other was local to Worcester; she  hopes to start a restaurant "South 9". 

Monday, May 28, 2018

Abolition of Chattel Slavery in Massachusetts









 The Abolition of Chattel Slavery in Massachusetts

 Slavery in Massachusetts

The exact date of the first African slaves in Massachusetts is unknown, but may have been as early as 1624 by a man named Samuel Maverick. The first confirmed account of slavery in the colony came in 1638 when several native prisoners taken during the Pequot War were exchanged in the West Indies for African slaves. Such exchanges become common in subsequent conflicts
Chattel slavery is ownership of one person by another person. The Chatel slave has no rights in the law as he is not a person.

Massachusetts was the first colony in New England with slave ownership and was a center for the slave trade throughout the 17th and 18th centuries. No legislation was passed that abolished slavery until the Thirteenth Amendment in 1865 was ratified by the state. Instead, the practice of slavery was ended through case law; and as an institution it died out in the late 18th century through judicial actions litigated on behalf of slaves seeking manumission. Emancipation was on a case by case basis.

In order preclude enslaved people from going to court to seek manumission some in the slave “owning class” listed the people they enslaved as “indentured servants” in the census.


 Elizabeth Freeman

Elizabeth Freeman was called Mumbets or Mum bet in her later years. Although her case was not directly related to the post American Revolution cases that led to the Massachusetts Court outlawing slavery, her case is important predecessor.

 I especially wanted to include her case upfront because my Grandmum was called Mother Davis. This form of addressing older Black women with children was, I thought, unique to my family. Now I know it has existed for some time.  My Aunt Lizzie has been addressed also as Mother Davis.


Elizabeth Freeman was born into slavery around 1744 at the farm of Pieter Hogeboom (a descendant of a New Netherland colonist). She had a sister, Lizzie. When Hogeboom's daughter Hannah married John Ashley of Sheffield, Massachusetts. Hogeboom gave Bet and her sister to Hannah and her husband.
Freeman remained with them until 1781, during which time she had a child, Little Bet. It is thought that her husband was killed in the American Revolution.

Throughout her life, Bet exhibited a strong spirit and sense of self. In 1780 Bet prevented Hannah from striking a servant girl with a heated shovel; Elizabeth shielded the girl and received a deep wound in her arm. As the wound healed, Bet left it uncovered as evidence of her harsh treatment. ]
Also in 1780, Freeman heard the newly ratified Massachusetts Constitution read at a public gathering in Sheffield, including the following:
]
“All men are born free and equal, and have certain natural, essential, and unalienable rights; among which may be reckoned the right of enjoying and defending their lives and liberties; that of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property; in fine, that of seeking and obtaining their safety and happiness.”

Inspired by these words, Bett sought the counsel of Theodore Sedgwick, a young abolition-minded lawyer, to help her sue for freedom in court.   Sedgwick accepted her case, as well as that of Brom, another of Ashley's slaves.

 He enlisted the aid of Tapping Reeve. It has been suggested the attorneys may have selected these plaintiffs to test the status of slavery under the new state constitution.

The case of Brom and Bett v. Ashley was heard in August 1781 before the County Court of Common Pleas in Great Barrington. Sedgwick and Reeve asserted that the constitutional provision that "all men are born free and equal" effectively abolished slavery in the state. When the jury ruled in Bett's favor, she became the first African-American woman to be set free under the Massachusetts state constitution.

The jury found that "...Brom & Bett are not, nor were they at the time of the purchase of the original writ the legal Negro of the said John Ashley..." The court assessed damages of thirty shillings and awarded both plaintiffs compensation for their labor.

After the ruling, Bett took the name Elizabeth Freeman and chose to work in attorney Sedgwick's household. She worked for his family until 1808 as senior servant and governess to the Sedgwick children, who called her "Mumbet."

 From the time Freeman gained her freedom, she became widely recognized and in demand for her skills as a healer, midwife and nurse. After the Sedgwick children were grown, Freeman moved into her own house on Cherry Hill in Stockbridge near her daughter, grandchildren and great grandchildren.

Although Freeman’s case emancipated her, it did end the institution of slavery in Massachusetts. The abolition of slavery was tested in the so called Freedom suits.

Freedom suits

There were three trials known as the Freedom suits, two civil and one criminal. These took place during the American Revolutionary War.  The civil cases were: Jennison v. Caldwell (for "deprivation of the benefit of his servant, Walker"), apparently heard and decided first, and Quock Walker v. Jennison (for assault and battery), both heard by the Worcester County Court of Common Pleas on June 12, 1781.


Jennison v. Caldwell
In the first case, Jennison argued that Caldwell had enticed away his employee Walker. The court found in his favor and awarded him 25 pounds.

Quock Walker v. Jennison

In 1781 Justice Cushing instructed the jury with these words:

“…our Constitution of Government, by which the people of this Commonwealth have solemnly bound themselves, sets out with declaring that all men are born free and equal – and that every subject is entitled to liberty, and to have it guarded by the laws, as well as life and property – and in short is totally repugnant to the idea of being born slaves. This being the case, I think the idea of slavery is inconsistent with our own conduct and Constitution; and there can be no such thing as perpetual servitude of a rational creature, unless his liberty is forfeited by some criminal conduct or given up by personal consent or contract ...”]

The jury freed Walker. Because Justice Cushing held that perpetual servitude is unconstitutional under the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, no further action by the Great and General Court (the formal name of the Massachusetts state legislature) was needed to end slavery in Massachusetts.


Commonwealth v. Jennison

In September 1781, a third case was filed by the Attorney General against Jennison, Commonwealth v. Jennison, for criminal assault and battery of Walker. In his charge to the jury, Chief Justice William Cushing stated,

 "Without resorting to implication in constructing the constitution, slavery is…as effectively abolished as it can be by the granting of rights and privileges wholly incompatible and repugnant to its existence." This has been taken as setting the groundwork for the end of slavery in the state. On April 20, 1783, Jennison was found guilty and fined 40 shillings.”

Aftermath of the trials

Massachusetts never formally abolished slavery until the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution in 1865.

 Legislators were unable or unwilling to address either slave-owners' concerns about losing their "investment", or white citizens' concerns that if slavery were abolished, freed slaves could become a burden on the community. Some feared that escaped slaves from elsewhere would flood the state.

The Massachusetts Supreme Court decisions in Walker v. Jennison and Commonwealth v. Jennison established the basis for ending slavery in Massachusetts on constitutional grounds, but no law or amendment to the state constitution was passed. Instead slavery gradually ended "voluntarily" in the state over the next decade. The decisions in the Elizabeth Freeman and Quock Walker trials had removed its legal support and slavery was said to end by erosion.

 Some slavers manumitted their enslaved people formally and arranged to pay them wages for continued labor. Other slaves were "freed" but were restricted as indentured servants for extended periods.  By 1790, the federal census recorded no slaves in the state.

Chattel slavery no longer exists in Massachusetts today.. However there are other forms of slavery or restriction of rights and earnings. There is human trafficking, debt slavery, and wage slavery which still exists in some forms within the Commonwealth.

Friday, March 9, 2018

Teamster /UPS National Contract 2018



National Teamster/UPS Contract

The Teamster International Union is negotiating new contracts for the workers at United Parcel Service. The present national contract ends July 31, 2018.. The national contract sets wages and health care.   There is a high potential of a strike on August 1, 2018.

The contract and possible strike might have country wide ramifications outside of just the United Parcel Service (UPS)  It influences the union organization efforts of the Teamsters at Amazon and other package handling companies.

The workers at UPS last struck in 1997. Many in Worcester walked with the striking Teamsters at the UPS distribution center in Shrewsbury.

Although it is not in the National Contract, the New England Regional contract has put on the table making Martin Luther King Day a UPS holiday. This is significant as it implies an anti-racist sentiment in the regional Teamster locals. Please see the New England Supplement proposals below.

A large number of the workers at UPS are people of color and women. Everyone who does the grunt work at UPS started out poor and making near minimum wage.

As a class we advance by means of good union jobs and civil service jobs, such as the Post Office and the military, and workers unity.


Other Issues in the National Contract

A.   Harassment
Article 37 currently has no penalty for harassment violations.
The IBT’s proposals include mandatory financial penalties for harassment violations. The minimum penalty would be 4 hours pay going up to a maximum penalty of one week’s pay depending on the severity of the offense.

An Article 37 Committee would be created at the National Grievance Panel to hear harassment grievances that deadlock at the local union and area grievance panel level. An arbitrator would sit in on harassment cases and break the tie if the Article 37 Committee deadlocks.
The danger is the lack of a real enforcement mechanism. The International Union’s proposals for dealing with harassment is based on the current set-up for 9.5 violations, but that procedure has been a failure.

B, Excessive Overtime
All package drivers would have their work day reduced to under 9.5 hours per day with the exception of November and December.
All hours worked after 9.5 would be paid at triple time pay and the driver’s work schedule would be adjusted.

Drivers who want to be exempt from the 9.5 limit would notify management in writing at any time—and have their wage rate increased by one dollar during the exemption period. They would not receive triple time pay for hours worked after 9.5.

Teamsters United proposed that 9.5 triple time pay automatically appear in the next paycheck, eliminating the unnecessary added step of filing a grievance to get paid what the contract promises.

Teamsters United also proposed making all work after 9.5 voluntary. Drivers would have the right to be relieved after 9.5 hours worked.
The Package Division rejected this proposal and replaced it with a 9 p.m. curfew for package drivers under Article 18.  The curfew still allows for a twelve for 13-hour day.

C. Full Time Jobs
 This union’s proposals demand the creation of 10,000 full-time 22.3 jobs over the life of the contract. The company would be required to maintain 22.3 jobs in the local where they are created and to provide reports to locals so that full-time job creation can be policed.

D. Dishonesty Definition
The union is proposing to eliminate the loophole that allows UPS to use technology to fire employees for “dishonesty.”

E. Supervisors Working
Proposed changes to Article 3 would set minimum and escalating penalties for supervisors working violations, starting with a minimum penalty of two hours at double-time pay. Violations of more than two hours would be paid at actual hours worked at double time.

F. Safety and Equipment
Members flooded the IBT with proposals on Article 18 and many have been incorporated into the union’s bargaining demands. The contract is an opportunity to win improvements on heating, cooling, ventilation, mirrors, tires, seats and other equipment.

F. Grievance Procedure
No changes are being proposed to Article 7 (Local and Area Grievance Machinery) or Article 8 (National Grievance Procedure). Apparently, Hoffa thinks the grievance procedure is working just fine!
Teamsters United proposed giving local unions the right to strike on deadlocked grievances and to issue a 72-hour strike notice when management is engaging in widespread harassment or violating grievance settlements.

Management would be required to meet within 72 hours. If the problems were not addressed, the local union would have the right to take any and all economic action, including a strike.


.
G. Higher Pay for Part time Workers

Increase starting part-time pay to $15 an hour.
Catch-up wage increases for current part-timers.
4-hour daily guarantee


New England Supplement Teamsters’ proposals

Because of the differences in regions of the country, there are Supplements to the national UPS contract. For this region there is a New England Supplement.

MLK Day established as UPS holiday.

Right to strike if grievance not met in a timely manner.

Overtime after 5 hours for part timers

Part timers offered full time jobs before new hires

More 123 full time jobs and they are to stay in local union jurisdiction

When supervisors work union jobs, additional penalties for failure to inform stewards

All hours after 8 hours is double time

Redefine term dishonesty

Discipline contract limitation for initial filing of one week

All discipline records end in 9 months.

Double time on Sunday and holiday 3 times after 10 hour
s
Seventh week of vacations

Posting vacation year round.

Two 15 minute breaks

End subcontractors

March 1 vacation schedule posting

Consistent start times


Package driver should be on 9-5 schedule

Friday, February 23, 2018

MAKING NEW ENGLAND WHITE



Image result for mETACOMET

Making New England White

The European domination and later United States domination of the region now known as New England took place over a period of almost 200 years. The British culture and people replaced the Native Indian cultures and people in a form of ethnic cleansing and genocide. New England is mostly White and Yankee. The Native Indian populations and cultures are marginalized and transformed.

Some of the Native Indian nations, tribes, and clans of New England are the following:

Abenaki -- Maine to Lake Champlain, south to the Merimac River, north to Quebec
Algonkin -- Ottowa River Basin, between Ontario and Quebec
Massachuset -- Valleys of the Charles and Neponset rivers in eastern Massachusetts.
Mattabesic -- Western Connecticut
Metoac -- Long Island
Micmac -- Canadian Maratimes
Mohegan -- Eastern Connecticut
Narragansett -- Narragansett Bay and western Rhode Island
Nauset -- Cape Cod
Niantic -- Southern coast of New England
Nipmuc -- Central Massachusetts, northern Connecticut and Rhode Island
Pennacook -- Merrimac River Valley of Southern New Hampshire
Pequot -- Southeastern Connecticut to the Niantic River
Pocumtuk -- Connecticut River Valley in Massachusetts
Wampanoag -- Southeastern Massachusetts, Martha's Vineyard, and Nantucket

The Native Indian people are the first people in New England and had come to the region thousands of years before the Europeans.

The European dominance of New England had its ebbs and flows. Some colonies failed and others were successful in attaining permanence. Besides the British, three other non-Native Indian centered nations vied for control of New England, Netherlands, France, and the United States.

The Native Indian nations/tribes had some military success against the Europeans until the gradual change in weaponry. Arrows vs. blunderbuss muskets was fairly even. With the introduction of mobile artillery and repeating rifles which ensured the success of the Europeans.

The demise of the Native Indians people had many elements. Some of the elements were disease, changes to cultural foundations, and war with the White colonists and their allies. This essay concentrates on the hostilities between the White colonies that became New England and the Native Indian people aboriginal to the region.



New Netherland

The Netherlanders were early to settle in New England. Their colony of New Netherland was established in 1621. The New Netherlanders claimed the area between the Delaware and the Connecticut Rivers.

 In 1624, the New Netherlanders established a short-lived trading post in present day Old Saybrook Connecticut. The trading post was named Kievits Hoek, or "Plover's Corner". Kievits Hoek was soon abandoned as the New Netherlanders consolidated settlement at New Amsterdam.   

In 1633 the House (Fort) of Hope was built at the present site of Hartford Connecticut as a trading post. The Fort was also short lived as the New Netherland colony was soon taken over by the British.


The Plymouth Colony

The Plymouth colony was established in 1620 with its capital in Plymouth Massachusetts. Approximately 100 British men and women, many of them members of the English Separatist Church, set sail for the New World aboard the Mayflower.

Both the Plymouth Colony and the Massachusetts Bay Colony had made treaties with the Native Indian nations, a major party to the treaties was the Wampanoag people.

The Mayflower landed on the shores of Cape Cod, near present-day Provincetown Massachusetts. Two months later, and in late December it anchored at Plymouth Rock. The colonists would form the first permanent settlement of Europeans in New England. Though more than half the original settlers died during that grueling first winter, the survivors were able to secure peace treaties with neighboring Native Indian tribes and build a largely self-sufficient economy within five years


New Hampshire

Under a British land grant, Plymouth Colony sent settlers to establish a fishing colony at the mouth of the Piscataqua River, near present-day Rye and Dover in 1623. In1630 Portsmouth  New Hampshire was founded.

After a 38-year period of union with Massachusetts, New Hampshire was made a separate royal colony in 1679. ,

Massachusetts Bay Colony

The colony that played the largest role in the formation of New England was Massachusetts Bay Colony

The Massachusetts Bay Colony was established in 1628 by the Massachusetts Bay Company. It was the Company’s second attempt at establishing a colony. Its first colony in Cape Anne set up in 1623 failed with the colonists returning to England.

The major towns of the Massachusetts Bay Colony were Boston and Salem.

The Massachusetts Bay Colony had a role to play in establishing or administrating all of the present day New England states with the exception of Vermont.

Colonists from Massachusetts Bay established new colonies in Hartford and Saybrook Connecticut. The New Hampshire Colony was administered by Massachusetts Bay until its separation. Colonists from Massachusetts Bay established Rhode Island. Maine was a part of Massachusetts until its secession in 1820.

Old Saybrook Colony

The Saybrook Colony was established in late 1635 at the mouth of the Connecticut River in present-day Old Saybrook by colonists from Massachusetts Bay. They claimed possession of the land via a deed of conveyance from royalty.
The colonists from Old Saybrook were the main British combatants against the Pequots during the Pequot War.


THE PEQUOT WAR
At the time of the British expansion into the Connecticut River Valley, the Pequot and the Narragansets were the two more powerful Native Indian nations. The Pequot people had divided into two groups. One group, Mohegans, had sided with the British colonists. The other Pequot faction had favored the New Netherlanders.
The British colonists in Saybrook colony steadily expanded into Pequot lands located predominately between the Pequot (now Thames) River and the Mystic River.
The decisive battle of this war was that of Mystic (Missituk) Village. The British with Native Indian allies burned Missituk and killed an estimated seven hundred Pequot people, including women and children.



By September 1638 the Peguot people had lost the war and was facing what we now call genocide. The British, Mohegans and Narragansetts met at the General Court of Connecticut and agreed on the disposition of the Pequot survivors.

The agreement is known as the first Treaty of Hartford and was signed on September 21, 1638. About 200 Pequot survived the war.  They submitted themselves to the authority of the sachem of the Mohegans or Naragansetts.
The Pequots were then bound by Covenant that none should inhabit their native land, nor should any of them be called PEQUOTS anymore. Instead they should themselves Mohegan or Narragansets for ever more.
Other Pequot people were enslaved and shipped to Bermuda or the West Indies, or were forced to become household slaves in English households in Connecticut and Massachusetts Bay. The Colonies essentially declared the Pequots extinct by prohibiting them from using the name, Pequot.

This was the first instance Algonquian peoples of southern New England encountered European-style warfare. After the Pequot War, there were no significant battles between Native Indians and southern New England colonists for about 38 years. This long period of peace came to an end in 1675 with King Philip's War.

Hartford Colony

 

The first British settlers establishing Hartford arrived in 1635 when 100 settlers with 130 head of cattle in a trek from Newtown (now Cambridge, Massachusetts) in the Massachusetts Bay Colony. The settlement was originally called Newtown, but was changed to Hartford in 1637.The nearby town of Windsor was established in 1633.

The fledgling colony along the Connecticut River had issues with the Massachusetts Bay Colony because it was outside of the jurisdiction of the Massachusetts Bay Colony's charter.
In order to justify the split from Massachusetts Bay Colony Thomas Hooker wrote the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut, a document investing the authority to govern with the people, instead of with a higher power.

The Hartford colonists aided Old Saybrook in the Pequot War,



Springfield Breaks Away From Hartford Colony.

The northernmost settlement of the Hartford Colony was Springfield Massachusetts. It was then known as Agawam. The Springfield settlement defected from Hartford Colony after four years and then joined forces with the coastal Massachusetts Bay Colony.

Springfield flourished as a trading post and agricultural center until 1675's King Philip's War, when a coalition of Native Indians laid siege to Springfield and later burned it to the ground. Its prosperity waned for the next hundred years.



New Haven Colony
Before Europeans arrived, the New Haven area was the home of the Quinnipiac tribe, which lived in villages around the harbor and subsisted off local fisheries and the farming of maize.

In 1637 a small party of Puritans wintered near New Haven harbor.  In April 1638, the main party of five hundred Puritans left the Massachusetts Bay Colony to settle in New Haven.  It was their hope to set up a theological community with the government more religious than the Puritan living in Massachusetts. The Quinnipiac, who were under attack by neighboring Pequot, allegedly sold their land to the settlers in return for protection.


CONNECTICUT 

The word "Connecticut" is derived from various anglicized spellings of an Algonquian word for "long tidal river"
Connecticut was established by the unification of the Saybrook, Hartford, and New Haven colonies.


Rhode Island and Providence Plantation

In 1636, Roger Williams was banished from the Massachusetts Bay Colony for his religious views, and he settled at the top of Narragansett Bay on land sold or given to him by Narragansett sachem Canonicus. Williams named the site Providence.

In 1638, Anne HutchinsonWilliam CoddingtonJohn ClarkePhilip Sherman, and other religious dissenters settled on Aquidneck Island (then known as Rhode Island)  The island  was purchased from the local tribes who called it Pocasset. This settlement was called Portsmouth by the colonists and was governed by the Portsmouth Compact.

The southern part of the island became the separate settlement of Newport after disagreements among the founders.

Samuel Gorton purchased lands at Shawomet in 1642 from the Narragansett nation. This acquisition precipitating a dispute with the Massachusetts Bay Colony. In 1644, Providence, Portsmouth, and Newport united for their common independence as the Colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations.

 Warwick Rhode Island in 1648 received a separate charter.

New England Confederation

The United Colonies of New England, commonly known as the New England Confederation, was a short-lived military alliance of the British colonies of Massachusetts BayPlymouthConnecticut, and New Haven. Formed in May 1643, its primary purpose was to unite the Puritan colonies in support of the church, and for defense against the Native Indians and the Dutch colony of New Netherland.

The Confederation gained importance during King Philip's War in 1675. The Confederation dissolved after the revocation of the members' charters in the early 1680s

Dominion of New England

Another attempt to amalgamate British colonies was made with the establishment of Dominion of New England in 1686.  King James II attempted to enforce royal authority over the autonomous colonies in British North America. After the Glorious Revolution of 1688, the colonies regained their independence under the Royal Charter.

Enslaved African people were introduced at this time into New England., although there is no record of any law legalizing these slave-holdings. The only legal basis for slavery was the argument that enslaved people were property.


MAINE

Native Indian People

The original inhabitants of the territory that is now Maine are Algonquian-speaking Wabanaki peoples, including the PassamaquoddyMaliseetPenobscotKennebec and Androscoggin.

During the latter part of the King Phillip's War, many of these Native Indian people would merge to become the Wabanaki Confederacy. This Confederacy aided the Wampanoag of Massachusetts and the Mahican of New York.

The colonists in Maine after the King Phillip’s War were unable to expand and some of the Native Indian tribes of Maine continued, unchanged, until the American Revolution.

Before the American Revolution most of the Native Indian people were considered by the colonists to be separate nations and not a part of the colony. This status was changed by the Indian Removal Act of 1830.

New France and Maine

The first European settlement in Maine was in 1604 on Saint Croix Island, The French named the entire area Acadia.

The French established two Jesuit missions: one on Penobscot Bay in 1609, and the other on Mount Desert Island in 1613. The same year, Castine was established by Claude de La Tour. In 1625, Charles de Saint-Étienne de la Tour erected Fort Pentagouet to protect Castine.

The first British settlement in Maine was established by the Plymouth Company at the Popham Colony in 1607. The Popham colonists returned to England after 14 months.

The coastal areas of western Maine first became the Province of Maine in a 1622 land patent. Eastern Maine north of the Kennebec River was more sparsely settled by the British and was known in the 17th century as the Territory of Sagadahock. A second settlement was attempted in 1623 by British explorer and naval Captain Christopher Levett at a place called York.  Levitt had been granted 6,000 acres by King Charles I of England. Like Popham it also failed.

KING PHILLIP’S WAR

King Philip’s War was a short, ferocious war. The Wampanoag sachem, Metacom, or King Philip, led a war against the rapidly expanding British colonies in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, parts of Connecticut, and Maine.
The war laid waste to New England. The Native Indians who had allied against the British suffered the worst casualties.  These Native Indian people lost the greatest proportion of their population of any war fought on American territory.

This loss of population necessitated the adoption of many people from outside of the subject tribes.

 Nearly 70 percent of the Wampanoag, Nipmuc, and Narragansett in Southeastern New England were killed or fled as refugees. Native Indians prisoners of war were forced into servitude in British households or were sold into slavery in the Caribbean. King Philip’s 9-year-old son was sold as a slave. At the war’s end there were public executions of Native Indians in Boston.

About 400 “praying Indians,’’ most of whom had remained neutral, were rounded up during the war and imprisoned in a concentration camp on barren Deer Island in Boston Harbor in winter. Hundreds starved or died of exposure. After the war, some were also sold as slaves. The Puritans said they couldn’t tell heathen Indians from Christian Indians.

Background to King Phillip’s War

Sometime before the King Phillip’s War a treaty of peace was concluded between the Wampanoag sachem Massasoit and the colonists at Plymouth. 

When Massaoit died his son, Wamsutta, whom the colonists called Alexander became sachem. There is evidence that Wamsutta displayed on all occasions a decided friendship for his white neighbors.

The early death of Wamsutta is thought by some to be a homicide by the hands of the colonists. It said that the colonists suspected him of plotting with the Narragansett to rise against the colonists in Plymouth. The council of Plymouth resolved to bring Wamsutta before them to answer for his conduct. It is said that Wamsutta was killed while enroute to Plymouth.

As a result of his death Metacomet, brother of Wamsutta, became sachem of the Wampanoag.


The conventional history of New England is that the King Philip’s War begins when Wampanoag warriors raid the frontier settlement of Swansee Massachusetts. The settlement was a part of the Plymouth Colony.

In the early 1670s, 50 years of peace between the Plymouth colony and the local Wampanoag people began to deteriorate when the rapidly expanding colonial settlements forced land sales on the tribe.
 Reacting to increasing Native Indian hostility, the British colonist from Plymouth met with King Philip, sachem of the Wampanoag. The colonists demanded that the Wampanoag surrender their arms. The Wampanoag did so.
 In 1675 a Christian Native Indian man, who had been acting as an informer to the colonists, was murdered. The colonists reacting to this killing kidnapped three Wampanoag. The three were given a trial and then executed for their alleged crime.
Metacomet retaliated by ordering the attack on Swansee. This attack was followed by a series of Wampanoag raids in which several settlements were destroyed and scores of colonists killed. The colonists then destroyed a number of Wampanoag villages.
The destruction of a Narragansett village by the colonists brought the Narragansett into the conflict on the side of the Wampanoag.  Within a few months several other tribes and all the New England colonies were involved.
From the St. Croix to the Housatonic, the Native Indian tribes were formed into a vast confederacy with Metacomet was acknowledged as the head
 In early 1676, the Narragansett were defeated and their chief killed. The main battle between the Narragansetts and the colonist was the so called “Great Swamp Fight”

The Great Swamp Fight/ King Phillip War
The Narraganset had established a stockade like village in the marches near Newport Rhode Island. There were provisions for the winter and access to the sea for other food.  Within the stockades were some six hundred wigwams. The village offered relative safety from the colonists during the winter of 1675/ 1676
After a four day battle in which the outcome was in doubt the colonists from Connecticut who had stayed for the most part in the rear of the fighting came forward and set fire to the village. Several thousand Narragansets were killed including women and children.
  The Wampanoag and their allies were gradually subdued. King Philip’s wife and son were captured, and on August 12, 1676, after his secret headquarters in Mount Hope, Rhode Island, was discovered, Metacomet was assassinated by a Native Indian in the service of the British. The British drew and quartered Metacomet’s body and publicly displayed his head on a stake in Plymouth.
Battle of Turner's Falls / King Phillip’s War      
Battle of Turner's Falls, also known as the Peskeompscut massacre, was fought on May 19, 1676, during King Philip's War, in present-day Gill, Massachusetts, near a falls on the Connecticut River. The site is across the river from the village of Turners Falls.

A band of British colonists under the command of Captain William Turner fell upon the poorly guarded Native Indian village of Peskeompscut near the falls at dawn. The colonists slaughtered many of its inhabitants. Most of the Native Indian people were children, women, and the elderly.
Some of the warriors in the camp escaped, and they regrouped with those from other nearby camps to harass the colonist’s retreat, during which Turner was killed.

After initially falling back, a Native alliance, some of whom came from Canada through Vermont, rallied warriors to wage a major offensives against the British settlers in the area of Turner Falls. The settlements of Northampton, Hatfield and Hadley were destroyed over the next month
The Wampanoag and others had lost almost all of their remaining children at Turner Falls. In many ways their very reason for fighting no longer existed. The war ended within a few months after the battle of Turner Falls.
The colonists also suffered from King Phillip’s War. One in 16 colonist men of military age was killed, half the towns in Plymouths and Massachusetts were ruined, and the economy was hobbled for 100 years.
Plymouth could not sustain itself after King Phillip’s War and was forced to become a part of Massachusetts.


THE FRENCH/ NATIVE INDIAN WARS AGAINST THE BRITISH

Britain and France struggled for colonial supremacy around the world, including in North America. In North America this struggle for imperialist power took place as a series of wars. These wars were on and off for a better part of a century from 1688 to 1763. These wars have several name depending on which side did the writing. For the New England colonists the wars are collectively referred to as the French and Indian Wars.

1688: (1688-1699) King William's War was  between France and the Wabanaki Confederacy and Britain and the Iroquois Confederacy.
1702: (1702-1713) Queen Anne's War  between the French and Spanish colonies allied with the Wabanaki Confederacy, Mohawk, Choctaw, Timucua, Apalachee and Natchez tribes against the British colonies allied with the Muscogee (Creek), Chickasaw and Yamasee tribes.

1744: (1744–1748) King George's War between the French colonies allied with the Wabanaki Confederacy and the British colonies allied with Iroquois Confederacy
1749: (1749 – 1754) Father Le Loutre's War

1754: 1754 - 1763: The French and Native Indian War is won by Great Britain against the French.

MORE ON MAINE

Central Maine was  inhabited by people of the Androscoggin tribe of the Abenaki nation, also known as Arosaguntacook. They were driven out of the area in 1690 during King William's War. They were relocated at St. Francis, Canada. This settlement was destroyed by Rogers' Rangers in 1759.  The area is called now Odanak.

KING WILLIAM’S WAR


King William's War (1688–97, also known as the Second Indian WarFather Baudoin's War, Castin's War or the First Intercolonial War.  For the French it was the North American theater of the Nine Years' War (1688–97). This war is additionally called the War of the Grand Alliance or the War of the League of Augsburg. It was the first of six colonial wars 

 New France and the Wabanaki Confederacy were able to thwart New England expansion into Acadia, whose border New France defined as the Kennebec River in southern Maine. According to the terms of the 1697 Treaty of Ryswickthat which ended the Nine Years' War, the boundaries and outposts of New France, New England, and New York remained substantially unchanged.

North America at the end of the 17th century

The British settlers were more than 154,000 at the beginning of the wars, outnumbering the French 12 to 1. New France was divided into three entities: Acadia on the Atlantic coast; Canada along the Saint Lawrence River and up to the Great Lakes; and Louisiana from the Great Lakes to the Gulf of Mexico, along the Mississippi River. The French population amounted to 14,000 in 1689.

Causes of King William’s War
The cause of the War is disputed. It is undisputed that the Native Indians did not submit to the demands of the British and their colonists.

In North America, there was significant tension between New France and the northern British colonies, especially Massachusetts. The 1686 the British colonies united into the Dominion of New England. New England and the Iroquois Confederacy fought New France and the Wabanaki Confederacy.

The Iroquois dominated the economically important Great Lakes fur trade and had been in conflict with New France since 1680. At the urging of New England, the Iroquois interrupted the trade between New France and the western tribes. In retaliation, New France raided Seneca lands of western New York. In turn, New England supported the Iroquois in attacking New France, which they did by raiding Lachine.

There were similar tensions on the border between New England and Acadia, which New France defined as the Kennebec River in southern Maine. Massachusetts’ charter included the Maine area and the colony would later att expanded its settlements into Acadia.

To secure New France's claim to present-day Maine, New France established Catholic missions among the three largest native villages in the region: one on the Kennebec River (Norridgewock); one further north on the Penobscot River (Penobscot) and one on the Saint John River (Medoctec).For their part, in response to King Philip's War, the five Indian tribes in the region of Acadia created the Wabanaki Confederacy to form a political and military alliance with New France to stop the New England expansion.

Aftermath of King William’s War

The Treaty of Ryswick signed in September 1697 ended the war between the two colonial powers, reverting the colonial borders to the status quo ante bellum. The peace did not last long; within five years, the colonies were embroiled in the next phase of the colonial wars, Queen Anne's War.



QUEEN ANNE’S WAR

War was declared against France by Queen Anne, of England, in May, 1702, and, of course, the contest was renewed in America.
 The conflict was characterized by frequent raids in Massachusetts, including one on Groton and the Deerfield Massacre in 1704.  By the end of the war, natives were successful in killing more than 700 British and capturing over 250 along the Acadia/ New England border.
The casualties’ statistics suffered by the Wabanaki Confederacy are difficult to find. This is likely because it did not lose the King William’s War.

The King William’s War ended in what was essentially a draw with  the British colonist unable to further expand.

In 1712, Britain and France declared an armistice, and a final peace agreement was signed the following year. Under terms of the 1713 Treaty of Utrecht, Britain gained Acadia (which they renamed Nova Scotia), sovereignty over Newfoundland, the Hudson Bay region, and the Caribbean island of St. Kitts.

France recognized British suzerainty over the Iroquois and agreed that commerce with American Indians farther inland would be open to all nations.  It retained all of the islands in the Gulf of Saint Lawrence, including Cape Breton Island, and retained fishing rights in the area, including rights to dry fish on the northern shore of Newfoundland.

By the later years of the war, many Abenakis had tired of the conflict despite French pressures to continue raids against New England targets. The peace of Utrecht, however, had ignored Indian interests, and some Abenaki expressed willingness to negotiate a peace with the New Englanders.

 Governor Dudley of Massachusetts organized a major peace conference at Portsmouth, New Hampshire . In negotiations there and at Casco Bay, the Abenakis objected to British assertions that the French had ceded to Britain the territory of eastern Maine and New Brunswick, but they agreed to a confirmation of boundaries at the Kennebec River and the establishment of government-run trading posts in their territory.

The Treaty of Portsmouth was ratified on July 13, 1713 by eight representatives of some of the tribes of the Wabanaki Confederacy; however, it included language asserting British sovereignty over their territory.

 Over the next year, other Abenaki tribal leaders also signed the treaty, but no Mi'kmaq ever signed it or any other treaty until 1726.


DMMER'S WAR

The Dummer's War (1722–1725, also known as Father Rale's WarLovewell's WarGreylock's War, the Three Years War, the 4th Anglo-Abenaki War, Wabanaki-New England War of 1722–1725, or Father Rale’s War was a series of battles between New England and the Wabanaki Confederacy (specifically the Mi'kmaqMaliseet, and Abenaki) who were allied with New France.

The eastern theater of the war was fought primarily along the border between New England and Acadia in Maine, as well as in Nova Scotia; the western theater was fought in northern Massachusetts and Vermont at the border between Canada (New France) and New England.

 During this time, Massachusetts included Maine and Vermont.

 Some Cause of Dummer’s War

Following the peace after Queen Anne’s War , New England settlements expanded east of the Kennebec River, and significant numbers of New Englanders began fishing in Nova Scotia waters. They established a permanent fishing settlement at Canso which upset the local Mi'kmaq, who then began raiding the settlement and attacking the fishermen.

The root cause of the conflict on the Maine frontier was over the border between Acadia and New England, which New France defined as the Kennebec River in southern Maine.  Mainland Nova Scotia came under British control after the Siege of Port Royal in 1710 and the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713 (not including Cape Breton), but both New Brunswick and virtually all of Maine remained contested territory between New England and New France.

The Treaty of Utrecht ended Queen Anne's War, but it had been signed in Europe and had not involved any member of the Wabanaki Confederacy. The Abenaki signed the Treaty of Portsmouth (1713), but none had been consulted about British ownership of Nova Scotia, and the Mi'kmaq began to make raids against New England fishermen and settlements.

The Dummer War began on two fronts as a result of the expansion of New England settlements along the coast of Maine and at Canso, Nova Scotia. The New Englanders were led primarily by Massachusetts Lt. Governor William Dummer, Nova Scotia Lt. Governor John Doucett, and Captain John Lovewell. The Wabanaki Confederacy and other Indian tribes were led primarily by Father Sébastien Rale, Chief Gray Lock, and Chief Paugus.

During the war, Father Rale (mitlitary leader of the allied French forces) was killed by the British at Norridgewock. The Indian population retreated from the Kennebec and Penobscot rivers to St. Francis and Becancour, Quebec, and New England took over much of the Maine territory.  In New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, the treaty that ended Father Rale's war marked a significant shift in European relations with the Mi'kmaq and Maliseet.

Battle of Norridgewock
 The colonists determined on an expedition against the Norridgewock Indians. The force consisted of two hundred and eight men and three Mohawk warriors.

The colonists army opened fired on the village when most of the Native Indian warrior were away. The colonist killed many women and children as they fled. Many of the Native Indian women and children were killed while fleeing into the river.


Aftermath of Dummer’s War

The Abenaki tribes  along the Maine border suffered several severe defeats during Dummer's War.  With the capture of Norridgewock in 1724 and the defeat of the Pequawket in 1725, which greatly reduced their numbers, the Native Indians withdrew to Canada, where they were settled at Bécancour and Sillery, and later at St. Francis, along with other refugee tribes from the south.

 Father Le Loutre's War 

 Father Le Loutre's War (1749–1755), also known as the Indian War, the Micmac War and the Anglo-Micmac War, took place between King George's War and the French and Native Indian War in Acadia and Nova Scotia. On one side of the conflict, the British and New England colonists, New England provided soldiers known as Rangers

 The French were led by Father Jean-Louis Le Loutre. He led the Mi'kmaq and the Acadia militia in guerrilla warfare against settlers and British forces. At the outbreak of the war there were an estimated 2500 Mi'kmaq and 12,000 Acadians in the region.

Some Causes of the Father Le Loutre War

 Although the British captured Port Royal in 1710, the Mi'kmaq and Acadians continued to contain the British in settlements at Port Royal and Canso. The rest of the Province was in the control of the Catholic Mi'kmaq and Acadians.

 About forty years later, the British made a concerted effort to settle Protestants in the region and to establish military control over all of Nova Scotia and present-day New Brunswick, igniting armed response from Acadians in Father Le Loutre's War.

 The British settled 3,229 people in Halifax during the first years. This exceeded the number of Mi'kmaq in the entire region and was seen as a threat to the traditional occupiers of the land. The Mi'kmaq and some Acadians resisted the arrival of these Protestant settlers.

During the war, the Acadians and Mi'kmaq left Nova Scotia for the French colonies of Ile St. Jean (Prince Edward Island) and Ile Royale (Cape Breton Island). The French also tried to maintain control of the disputed territory of present-day New Brunswick.

Father Le Loutre tried to prevent the New Englanders from moving into present-day New Brunswick just as a generation earlier, during Father Rale's War, Rale tried to prevent New Englanders from taking over present-day Maine.

Throughout the war, the Mi’kmaq and Acadians attacked the British forts in Nova Scotia and the newly established Protestant settlements. They wanted to retard British settlement and buy time for France to implement its Acadian resettlement scheme
The war ended after six years with the defeat of the Mi'kmaq, Acadians and French in the Battle of Fort Beausejour.

Aftermath of Father Le Loutre’s War

Father Le Loutre's War continued the British war tactics of total war which target civilians. British civilians had not been spared from some aspects of total war.

The war caused unprecedented upheaval in the area. Atlantic Canada witnessed large population movements.

With the defeat of the French, the Acadians, and the Mi'kmaq by the British, the Mi'kmaq was force to sue for peace. The Mi'kmaq signed successively more disadvantageous peace treaties until they were forced into reservations. All claims to rights and lands outside of the reservation were taken away.

The Acadians who did not pledge loyalty to Britain were expelled from Nova Scotia.

The British colony of Massachusetts claimed Maine with borders extending into present day Newfoundland. The border between Maine and British Canada was not formalized until the 19th Century  

THE FRENCH AND NATIVE INDIAN WAR

The French and Indian War (1754–63) comprised the North American theater of the worldwide Seven Years' War of 1756–63. It pitted the colonies of British America against those of New France. Both sides were supported by military units from their parent countries of Great Britain and France, as well as by American Indian allies.
 At the start of the war, the French North American colonies had a population of roughly 60,000 settlers, compared with 2 million in the British North American colonies.[3] The outnumbered French particularly depended on the Indians.

The name French and Indian War is used mainly in the United States. It refers to the two main enemies of the British colonists: the royal French forces and the various American Indian forces allied with them. The British colonists were supported at various times by the IroquoisCatawba, and Cherokee.

The French colonists were supported by Wabanaki Confederacy members Abenaki and Mi'kmaq, and AlgonquinLenapeOjibwaOttawaShawnee, and Wyandot.

The outcome was one of the most significant developments in a century of Anglo-French conflict. France ceded to Great Britain its territory east of the Mississippi. It ceded French Louisiana west of the Mississippi River (including New Orleans) to its ally Spain in compensation for Spain's loss to Britain of Florida. (Spain had ceded Florida to Britain in exchange for the return of Havana, Cuba.) France's colonial presence north of the Caribbean was reduced to the islands of Saint Pierre and Miquelon, confirming Great Britain's position as the dominant colonial power in eastern North America.

. In 1755, the British captured Fort Beauséjour on the border separating Nova Scotia from Acadia, and they ordered the expulsion of the Acadians (1755–64) soon afterwards. Orders for the deportation were given by William ShirleyCommander-in-Chief, North America, without direction from Great Britain. The Acadians were expelled, both those captured in arms and those who had sworn the loyalty oath to His Britannic Majesty.
Native Indians likewise were driven off the land to make way for settlers from New England.

 MORE ABOUT MAINE

After the British defeated the French in Acadia in the 1740s, the territory from the Penobscot River east fell under the nominal authority of the Province of Nova Scotia, and together with present-day New Brunswick formed the Nova Scotia county of Sunbury, with its court of general sessions at Campobello. American and British forces contended for Maine's territory during the American Revolution and the War of 1812, with the British occupying eastern Maine in both conflicts.

 The territory of Maine was confirmed as part of Massachusetts when the United States was formed following the Treaty of Paris ending the revolution, although the final border with British North America was not established until the Webster–Ashburton Treaty of 1842.

Maine was physically separate from the rest of Massachusetts. Long-standing disagreements over land speculation and settlements led to Maine residents and their allies in Massachusetts proper forcing an 1807 vote in the Massachusetts Assembly on permitting Maine to secede; the vote failed. Secessionist sentiment in Maine was stoked during the War of 1812 when Massachusetts pro-British merchants opposed the war and refused to defend Maine from British invaders.

 In 1819, Massachusetts agreed to permit secession, sanctioned by voters of the rapidly growing region the following year. Formal secession and formation of the state of Maine as the 23rd state occurred on March 15, 1820, as part of the Missouri Compromise, which geographically limited the spread of slavery and enabled the admission to statehood of Missouri the following year, keeping a balance between slave and free states.


VERMONT

For thousands of years indigenous peoples, including the Mohawk and the Algonquian-speaking Abenaki, occupied much of the territory that is now Vermont and was later claimed by France's colony of New France. France ceded the territory to Great Britain after being defeated in 1763 in the Seven Years' War.

For many years some historian believed that Native Indians did not inhabit the region now called Vermont. Those historians argued that it was a hunting ground without permanent Native Indian occupation.

The point of view of no permanent occupation of Vermont is disputed as research on the issue continues.

During the series of French and Native Indian wars against the British fighting took place in Vermont especially during the Father Rale’s War.


Vermont was never a British colony. It was disputed territory between New Hampshire and New York colonies. Settlers who held land titles granted by New York were opposed by the Green Mountain Boys militia, which supported the many settlers whose claims were based on grants from New Hampshire.


Ultimately, the settlers with New Hampshire grants prevailed in creating an independent state, the Vermont Republic. Founded in 1777 during the American Revolutionary War, the republic lasted for 14 years. Vermont was also the first state to join the U.S. as its 14th member state after the original 13. While still an independent republic, Vermont was the first of any future U.S. state to partially abolish slavery.
 
 THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION 

It is written in the Declaration of Independence the dislike of Native Indians by the American revolutionist.

The Declaration of Independence describes Native Indian people as “merciless Indian Savages”. The American claimed that the Native Indians conspired with King George to attack the colonists.

This mind can be found in the earliest descriptions of Native Indians by colonists such as those of the Pequot War and the King Phillip’s War. Reasonable people can make the case the American colonists were racist and that racism has continued through today.

After the defeat of the French in 1763 the British Crown made some efforts to protect the Native Indian lands from the encroachment of the American colonists and land speculators. The colonists resented even this effective efforts by the British Crown.
The Treaty of Paris which resolved the issue of the American Revolution, the British ceded to the American colonist control of the lands between the Mississippi River and the Appalachian Mountains.  The Native Indicans living there were no longer afforded any protection from the encroaching Americans. 
Those Native Indian nations that supported the King of England did so for rationale reason of promised protection from American colonists.

For the most part the Native Indian tried to remain neutral in the conflict of the American colonist against the British government.

 THE INDIAN REMOVAL ACT OF 1830.

The act of Congress removed the nationhood from all Native Indians living in the United States. A Native Indian could not be a member of a Native Indian nation after 1830.
For those Native Indians who renounced their tribal nationhood there was no automatic citizenship in the United States. There was for them a form of statelessness which each state had to address at some point.

In Massachusetts Native Indians were not recognized as residents of the State until the mid-19th Century.

It wasn't until 1993 that the Cairo tribe was officially recognized by the Georgia General Assembly. McCormick said American Indians could secure a visa to travel through Georgia, but they were not legally allowed to live here until that Act was repealed.

The Native Indian nations had no legal status except to void its legal status. The individual Native Indians who no longer claimed membership in a tribal nation were allowed to stay in the United States. Those who refused were expelled to what was then called Indian Territory west of the Mississippi River. That area is now called Oklahoma.

The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was repealed in March 1980. The Federal government of the United States is now in the process of recognizing Native Indian nations.